Hatch Spring Height/Fitment

Suzuki hatchback tech questions and answers.
User avatar
fritz
Posts: 711
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2004 11:21 am
Location: Perth WA

- admin: Posts split from for sale section -

Not meaning to hijack your post, but how much lower does the hatch leaf springs sit?
hatchman
Posts: 235
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2004 7:42 pm

dont know exactly how much lower it sits... its noticeably lower, thats 4 sure, as the mightyboy rears are lifted compared to the front... i'll try to find a pic of the rear with hatch leafs fitted
User avatar
Josh
Posts: 1263
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 2:22 am
Location: Canberra ACT
Contact:

Has anyone done the conversion?

I'm a little sceptical off the [presumably stiffer - given the greater load rating] Hatch springs giving greater stability than the standard MightyBoy ones, which tend to be too stiff and bounce around on rough roads as it is...
[url=http://www.tamon.org/?page=owners&id=10][img]http://www.tamon.org/forum/images/ute_specs.gif[/img][/url]
User avatar
fritz
Posts: 711
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2004 11:21 am
Location: Perth WA

I really would like to know too.
The parabolic springs are about right for me. I wouldnt want a lot softer, but equally, harder springs might start the rear skipping on rough roads. - Especially when a rear sway bar is fitted.
I'd happily keep the parabolic springs, but I am pretty keen to lower the rear another 20mm or so on top of the 2 inch lowering blocks. I have got to say that I am a little dissapointed in how low (or not low to be precise) my boy is with the king springs & lowering blocks. :cry: :cry: :cry:
User avatar
Brayden
Posts: 9101
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 3:09 am
Location: Canberra ACT
Contact:

By my measurements the Hatch springs make the unloaded axle sit at 2cm higher than the MB spring. (Which lowers the body by 2cm)

Technically the extra springs should stiffen up the rear end and make the ride firmer (read: rougher), however they would do little to improve the handling dynamics.

Dunno, I might as well test it out and see.

-edit-

Fritz, just bear in mind that going any lower on the suspension will require you to modify or cut out the bump stops. At 40mm lower I had to shave the rubber stops and I've still only got ~40mm of clearance.
F8B EFI turbo - Three pots and a snail.
User avatar
Josh
Posts: 1263
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 2:22 am
Location: Canberra ACT
Contact:

Really? I was pretty impressed with the new look and handling of Brayden's ute after the same conversion... I don't know that I'd want to go much lower for fear of having to wog-crawl over every little indentation in the road in my travels.

I've had past experiences where the corrugations and bumps in the road (namely on the SuziTech Cruise) have been enough to cause the rear end to come unstuck, even at speeds well below 60km/h. There's no way I'd want the back end any stiffer... (not including a swaybar to guard against bodyroll, of course)
[url=http://www.tamon.org/?page=owners&id=10][img]http://www.tamon.org/forum/images/ute_specs.gif[/img][/url]
User avatar
fritz
Posts: 711
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2004 11:21 am
Location: Perth WA

Good point brayden. Hadn't really thought about the bump stop. Grrrr.... - Maybe 10mm more wont hurt it too much?... Although it seem like a bit of stuffing around just for 10mm
As it is, I haven't actually bottomed out on anything yet - & that includes going over curbs etc at medium pace.

I just cant help but be annoyed by the distance between the rear wheels & the gaurds. Ideally I'd like it to be level or just tucked under

http://members.iinet.net.au/~fritzgru/i ... GP3023.JPG
http://members.iinet.net.au/~fritzgru/i ... GP3024.JPG

Brayden - I thought you had 50mm lowering blocks?
hatchman
Posts: 235
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2004 7:42 pm

stiffer? i wouldnt say so... nicer drive... yes, more control on the rear of the car, not skipping when switching lanes... yes
User avatar
fritz
Posts: 711
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2004 11:21 am
Location: Perth WA

What makes you say that Hatchman?
User avatar
Josh
Posts: 1263
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 2:22 am
Location: Canberra ACT
Contact:

hatchman wrote:stiffer? i wouldnt say so... nicer drive... yes, more control on the rear of the car, not skipping when switching lanes... yes
I refuse to believe that *multiple-leaf Hatch springs are not stiffer and thus bouncier than the *parabolic-leaf standard MightyBoy springs.


*edited: Sorry guys, my mistake. What was I thinking?
Last edited by Josh on Fri Apr 30, 2004 1:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
[url=http://www.tamon.org/?page=owners&id=10][img]http://www.tamon.org/forum/images/ute_specs.gif[/img][/url]
User avatar
fritz
Posts: 711
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2004 11:21 am
Location: Perth WA

MB's are parabolic. Single leaf of varying thickness.
I have been informed that the idea behind them is much the same as progressive rate springs. Soft to start with, & they then tighten up as they deflect more (get loaded).

I think eDave (?) has a 3 leaf setup (not hatch), so he may well be able to enlighten us on this issue?
hatchman
Posts: 235
Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2004 7:42 pm

owning 4 hatchs and multiple mightyboys... the front end, supension wise, exactly same, only rear is slightly different... and drive one after another with both 12" and 14" wheel combinations... u know the difference
User avatar
Brayden
Posts: 9101
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2004 3:09 am
Location: Canberra ACT
Contact:

Sorry, yes Fritz, my lowering blocks are in fact 2" (50mm). The top of the tyre 165/65/13 sits even with the guard, and just inside once there is a driver or passenger in the cabin.

As for Hatch springs making the performance of the rear suspension any better, I really doubt it. The extra springs in the Hatch are merely designed to accomodate the higher payload capacity - cornering dynamics would change very little.
Perhaps in an stock MB with clapped out shocks you would notice an increase in handling performance, but not if you've got new shocks and the stock MB springs are working correctly.
But, in the interests of being open minded, I'm going to try it out myself and tell you how it goes.

Oh, and Dave has a custom set of Lovells rear springs that are much more advanced that the stock ones, they are a coupled leaf setup which essentially looks much the same as a single leaf, but works much better.
F8B EFI turbo - Three pots and a snail.
User avatar
fritz
Posts: 711
Joined: Fri Apr 16, 2004 11:21 am
Location: Perth WA

Hmmm... - I'm pretty dard about that. I've got 155/65-13's (5mm smaller radius than the 165's) and mine I reckon it sits about 20mm clear of the rear gaurd. - I cant figure out why mine would be riding that much higher than brayden's? The shocks I have seem to be hevier duty than norm & have a decent amount of natural rebound, but I wouldn't have thought that'd make that much difference :?: :?: :?:
Surely the springs themselves aren't set higher or are less fatigued?

Oh, and I just had to laugh at the performance f5a carb Pete... :P
User avatar
Josh
Posts: 1263
Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 2:22 am
Location: Canberra ACT
Contact:

Glad someone said it before I did... :lol:
[url=http://www.tamon.org/?page=owners&id=10][img]http://www.tamon.org/forum/images/ute_specs.gif[/img][/url]
Post Reply