Page 2 of 3
Posted: Sat May 14, 2005 11:48 am
by Dudley
Oti you are better of saving up alittle bit more cash and heading to jaycar. There new range has been released and the stores should be stocked soon. The latest subwoofer is $179 and from what i have heard, its very very good value for money. Hell, if you go in they will probably have last years model of sub for dirt cheap.
Pat
Posted: Sat May 14, 2005 3:02 pm
by Josh
Yeah, for cheap crap Jaycar's Response range hold up pretty well...
Posted: Sun May 15, 2005 10:37 am
by Dudley
Oh look at me im mister audio genius!
Hes talking about buying a sub with "power" written on it for $30, i don't think your helping him with his dilema. The new jaycar range holds up pretty well against other lower end audio gear from what i've heard. But as they say, you get what you pay for.
Pat
Posted: Sun May 15, 2005 1:57 pm
by bretto
Posted: Sun May 15, 2005 7:20 pm
by Josh
Dudley wrote:Oh look at me im mister audio genius!
Far from it, I'm afraid.
I see your point in that anything is going to be a step up from the particular subs this forum was created to draw attention to, however I don't see any need to be a spiteful little fock about it.
Posted: Sun May 15, 2005 10:20 pm
by Dudley
Appy-polly-loggies my good sir.
Posted: Sun May 15, 2005 11:57 pm
by fritz
Posted: Mon May 16, 2005 12:03 am
by Brayden
Josh, who is being spiteful? I already deleted your first attempt at replying to Dudleys SARCASTIC post but your second go still carries the same tone... did someone shit in your cereal?
Posted: Mon May 16, 2005 6:55 pm
by Josh
Brayden wrote:Josh, who is being spiteful? I already deleted your first attempt at replying to Dudleys SARCASTIC post...
Good question. Why? And why didn't you notify me of the deletion and explain your choice of action?
What indication is there that the post is sarcastic? It looks exactly the same on my display as all the other cutting, spiteful slag I see getting thrown around.
Brayden wrote:but your second go still carries the same tone...
No, I disagree. After careful thought I admitted partial fault on my second attempt.
Posted: Mon May 16, 2005 7:41 pm
by Dudley
Dudley wrote:Oh look at me im mister audio genius!
This part is sarcasm, note the "LOLZ!@@#!" smiley face at the end, implying sarcasm.
Dudley wrote:Hes talking about buying a sub with "power" written on it for $30, i don't think your helping him with his dilema
This part was serious.
Pat
Posted: Mon May 16, 2005 7:55 pm
by Josh
So how do you differentiate between a ':lol:' that is intended to be in good jest and a ':lol:' that implies you are laughing (and inviting the group to laugh) directly at me as your writing suggests?
Posted: Mon May 16, 2005 8:55 pm
by Dudley
You're just gunna have to use your best judgement
Back on topic: How is the audio hunt going Oti?
Posted: Mon May 16, 2005 9:25 pm
by Josh
Right. Well nuts to any of you who rip on me for doing so.
Posted: Mon May 16, 2005 10:23 pm
by Mel
oh for fucks sake people can we dispense with all this petty bitchery and get back to the sharing of advice that we are all here for????
everyone has different ideas... they are all equally as valid....
GET OVER IT!!!!
Posted: Mon May 16, 2005 10:34 pm
by Brayden
Agreed. In future cases I will not spend my time giving grammar lessons to anyone who is unable to either intercept or articulate sarcasm.
It is far easier for me to nuke posts instead and save some sanity.
Anyway, back on topic, lest ye feel the wrath of my admin wand!
