Page 4 of 5
Posted: Fri May 07, 2004 10:14 pm
by Josh
IF YOU ARE OFFENDED BY COARSE LANGUAGE DO NOT SCROLL DOWN! IF YOU SCROLL DOWN YOU ACCEPT THAT YOU MAY BE EXPOSED TO PROFANITY!
Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh... That's better...
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
Posted: Sat May 08, 2004 9:04 am
by Colin
thats not your's its too big
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif)
Posted: Sat May 08, 2004 11:44 am
by Josh
Geez, Col... I'm running out of fingers to give you...
![Evil or Very Mad :evil:](./images/smilies/icon_evil.gif)
Posted: Sat May 08, 2004 8:04 pm
by Colin
got a idea..................................tell lies
![Liar :liar:](./images/smilies/eusa_liar.gif)
Posted: Sun May 09, 2004 8:02 pm
by Mel
lol that cat takes the cake adam!
Posted: Thu May 20, 2004 11:30 pm
by mowog
[quote="Josh"] deleting them sighting that I'm redirect traffic away from his site to Brayden's.
![Embarassed :oops:](./images/smilies/icon_redface.gif)
[/quote]
Sighting? I'm redirect ?
Posted: Fri May 21, 2004 12:22 am
by Josh
mowog wrote:Josh wrote: deleting them sighting that I'm redirect traffic away from his site to Brayden's.
Sighting? I'm redirect ?
Find a skin that you could read text on?
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif)
Posted: Fri May 21, 2004 12:45 am
by Brayden
mowog wrote:Josh wrote: deleting them sighting that I'm redirect traffic away from his site to Brayden's.
Sighting? I'm redirect ?
Hahaha! Josh = owned.
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
Posted: Fri May 21, 2004 4:06 am
by Josh
Brayden wrote:I won't bother to air my dirty laundry in public guys - it really serves no purpose. Suffice to say that David and I have had our severe and often bitter differences in the past.
Brayden wrote:Pffft, he's a wierdo Queanbeyanite - there's a world of difference.
![No idea :NFI:](./images/smilies/icon_noidea.gif)
Posted: Fri May 21, 2004 12:24 pm
by Brayden
Yes Josh, the difference being that I'm not the spelling nazi who points out everyones mistakes.
Hence why you have been owned.
![Poking out tongue :P](./images/smilies/icon_tongue.gif)
Posted: Fri May 21, 2004 1:37 pm
by truder44
![Question :?:](./images/smilies/icon_question.gif)
Josh
What's wrong with
suffice in Brayden's post?
![Surprised :-o](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
Posted: Fri May 21, 2004 7:19 pm
by Josh
The abscence of a 'd', perhaps?
And let me remind you that there's only one particular retard I've held accountable for poor spelling in the last month and it didn't occur on this forum.
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
Posted: Fri May 21, 2004 8:44 pm
by Colin
Josh
![Surprised :-o](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
your not turning into a poffy english teacher are you
![Embarassed :oops:](./images/smilies/icon_redface.gif)
Posted: Sat May 22, 2004 1:32 am
by mowog
Unless I am mistaken "suffix" is correct in the present tense; "sufficed" would apply if Brayden was using the past tense.
So how would Josh spell "wierdo" bearing in mind it is a colloquialism of "wierd"?
![Exploder :bomb:](./images/smilies/icon_explode.gif)
Posted: Sat May 22, 2004 12:47 pm
by Brayden
English 101:
"Suffice" is perfectly acceptable - it simply means to "be enough", and in the context I used it, means that what I was about to say would be sufficient to explain the story without explicit details.
I was willing to concede that I had spelt "wierdo" incorrectly, because I always mix up the "I" before "E" thing when I'm not paying attention.
![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)