Team MightyBoy

OMG everyone who owns a V8 is gonna get killed with this
(not to mention anyone with a sub in there car)

http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/10/1019.asp



hope this never comes out here

That’s so bad.

Wonder whats the loudest you can go?

inopportune honk of the horn

When are they appropriate?

Similar red light camera and photo radar technology has generated billions of dollars worldwide. In Washington, DC alone, cameras billed drivers more than $171 million since 1999.

Well, it's nice to know the conservatives are focussing on our safety and wellbeing in purchasing such devices.

They can suck my wang!!! Wise arses

dude that SUCKS totally

i personally dont think its a very good technology.

tale two cars next to each other one quiet and one noisy and ill bet it will book both of them just to make money. also it will possibly only get the not noisyt one ...

stupid people of the world

also there should be a tiem limit - for example after 10 at night

I say bring it on. Hell they can put one out the front of my house, along with a speed camera.

I get sick of dickheads screaming past my place in the middle of the night in their bogan-spec Falcodore or doofed-up rice rockets doing 100kph in a 60 zone with either half an exhaust or 12 subwoofers cranking. There are limits to what is acceptable.

I have a fundamental problem with the fact the move is only really being made to generate money, masquerading as a service to the public - like every other camera.

It's question of what exact noise threshold they're going to pick that has me worried the most...

Brayden wrote:I say bring it on. Hell they can put one out the front of my house, along with a speed camera.

I get sick of dickheads screaming past my place in the middle of the night in their bogan-spec Falcodore or doofed-up rice rockets doing 100kph in a 60 zone with either half an exhaust or 12 subwoofers cranking. There are limits to what is acceptable.

LOL they wouldnt put them anywhere near your house not enuff money to be made there, thery would only have them in the city.

altho I think I would take simmilar action to this bloke
http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/07/773.asp

Brayden wrote:I say bring it on. Hell they can put one out the front of my house, along with a speed camera.

I get sick of dickheads screaming past my place in the middle of the night in their bogan-spec Falcodore or doofed-up rice rockets doing 100kph in a 60 zone with either half an exhaust or 12 subwoofers cranking. There are limits to what is acceptable.

+1 to that.

I wonder if public transport buses are exempted. Some of the noisiest vehicles on NSW roads imho.

I think its all a big pile of wank!

I dont see how they can distinguish a big Mack truck driving down Northbourne to the friday night fucktards driving down the same road into Braddon. (sorry for the A.C.T. only refs)

I cant see how a project like this can get up and running, even under the guise of "public safety".

I understand a noise limit around places like hospitals or retirement homes... or after midnight, like you have in your average residential suburbs, but really.... the highways and freeways... yeah good luck to that!

If more people had commonsense and courtesy for others, we wouldnt need stupid ideas like this to keep your local dickhead in check, but instead local dick is too busy fitting his car with whistles and turning the base up to max to get his woman off on his "fully sik" skitz mix"doof" high octane style.

what he said

we have a speed camera here which is normally out of operation - either from kids spray painting the lens (somehow) or from them bieng lit on fire

this is at terrigal

Fraser wrote:what he said

Careful who you're calling "he"